THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WINNING AND LOSING IN SILAT 28th 2015 SEA GAMES SINGAPORE (INDONESIA: CLASS A AND D)
Shapie, M.N.M (1,2) & Dzarul Izzaidie, D.I. (1)
1.Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Rekreasi, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to describe the
accuracy among Indonesian Silat’s team during Sea Games 2015. A video recording
during the match was use for the analysis. A video recording
during the match was used for the analysis. The skills were coded into
categories which are punches, kick, sweep, dodge, catch, fake punches/fake
kicks and topple down. By using sample t-test used to analyses the data between
winner and loser. Result shows that the winner used kicking, sweep and topple
down techniques compared to the loser.
INTRODUCTION
Silat is the essence of combat and
self-defense, the true fighting application of the techniques. Silat is part of martial arts from Malaysia,
Singapore, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand and Brunei. It played an important
role in the history and culture of Malaysian and Indonesian people. Silat should
be learn from younger ages so they could use silat as protection. Silat
is widely known through much of South East Asia, the term pencak silat is used
mainly in Indonesia.
According
to Widiastuti (2014), one of pencak silat course goals is to improve
students skills. One of learning process is game approach which is it involve
exciting, fun, and motivating for students. It creates involvement of students
in the class, larger excitement to improve and study new advanced skills, and
motivating the students to perform well in class.
There
is a lot of motion analysis of silat including punch, kick, block, sweep,
topple, and dodge. Previous study has been studied about the activity profile
during action time. According to Mohamed Shapie, Oliver, O’Donoghue, and Tong (2013)
the nature of work periods within any combat sports depends on the frequency,
volume and type of the activity being performed. The objective of this study is
to describe the skills involved between the winner and loser as well as to
determine the factor that influences the winner to win.
MOVEMENT
CATEGORIES
Punch:
The punch ‘tumbuk’ attack is done by a hand with a closed fist hitting the
target.
Kick:
The kick ‘tendang’ is an attacking movement which is performed with one leg or
two legs simultaneously a kick can be aimed at any target.
Block:
The blocking movements using arms, elbows and legs with the purpose to block
off or striking back at any attack.
Catch:
The catch ‘tangkapan’ is done by using the hand to obstruct the opponent from
carrying out an attack.
Topple:
There are various ways of toppling down one’s opponent. For example, a silat
exponent ‘pesilat’ can either push or shove.
Sweep:
Swiping ‘sapuan’ involves attacking an opponent leg.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Analysis
has been done with a video recording of Class A and D Men’s final matches during
Sea Games in Singapore 2015. Two competitors are involved from different team
or country. This match consists of three rounds, which is two minute per round
and one-minute rest between each round. This notation involved various skills
such as punch, kick, block, catch, topple and sweep. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) is used to calculate the
statistical analysis and result. The video is repeated at least two times so
the data can be taken properly. The frequency was taken as data to be analyzed.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND RESULT
1.
Men’s Class A Indonesia
Versus Singapore (Indonesia won)
|
Various Skill and
Outcome
|
|||||
|
|
Group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
Score
|
INDO
|
3
|
19.6667
|
16.56301
|
9.56266
|
|
SIN
|
3
|
20.6667
|
4.61880
|
2.66667
|
|
TABLE 1
|
|
HIT TARGET
|
HIT ELSEWHERE
|
MISS OPPONENT
|
TOTAL
|
|
INDONESIA
|
37
|
4
|
18
|
59
|
|
SINGAPORE
|
26
|
18
|
18
|
62
|
2.
Men’s Class A
Indonesia Versus Philippines (Indonesia won)
|
Various Skills and
Outcome
|
|||||
|
|
Group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
Score
|
INDO
|
3
|
16.3333
|
15.37314
|
8.87568
|
|
PHI
|
3
|
15.3333
|
4.16333
|
2.40370
|
|
TABLE 2
|
|
HIT TARGET
|
HIT ELSEWHERE
|
MISS OPPONENT
|
TOTAL
|
|
INDONESIA
|
34
|
9
|
6
|
49
|
|
PHILIPPINES
|
12
|
20
|
14
|
46
|
3. Men’s
Class D Indonesia Versus Thailand (Indonesia Lost)
|
Varios Skills and
Outcome
|
|||||
|
|
Group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
Score
|
INDO
|
3
|
32.3333
|
7.09460
|
4.09607
|
|
THAI
|
3
|
35.0000
|
23.64318
|
13.65040
|
|
TABLE 3
|
|
HIT TARGET
|
HIT ELSEWHERE
|
MISS OPPONENT
|
TOTAL
|
|
INDONESIA
|
40
|
31
|
26
|
97
|
|
THAILAND
|
62
|
32
|
13
|
107
|
4.
Men’s
Class A Indonesia Versus Vietnam (Indonesia Lost)
|
Various Skills and
Outcome
|
|||||
|
|
Group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
Score
|
INDO
|
3
|
25.3333
|
15.69501
|
9.06152
|
|
VIE
|
3
|
22.6667
|
11.15049
|
6.43774
|
|
TABLE 4
|
|
HIT TARGET
|
HIT ELSEWHERE
|
MISS OPPONENT
|
TOTAL
|
|
INDONESIA
|
13
|
20
|
43
|
76
|
|
VIETNAM
|
10
|
27
|
31
|
68
|
DISCUSSION
As the result,
we can see that both Men’s Class A Indonesia vs Singapore and Philippines won
the game. From Table 1, Indonesia has advantage with their hit target on their
opponent with 37 direct hits. From Table 2, Indonesia massively scores 34
direct hits while Philippines only manage to do 12 hits.
Another
factor that leads to the win of Indonesia is by their accuracy of
dodging/evading. This statement can be proved from Table 2 that Indonesia only
missed their attacking by 6 while Philippines score 14. From Table 3 and Table
4, Indonesia has lost the match. According to Table 3, Indonesia is lacking on
direct hit to their opponent (Thailand). They only score 40 hits while Thailand
overpowers them with 62 hits. For this match, Indonesia also makes error with
their missed target on their opponent. The score was 26.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, Indonesia’s team presented a good
performance for all matches especially for category Men’s Class A. They claim
the winning by having a good accuracy on delivering direct hits to their
opponent. Plus, they also make less hit elsewhere and focusing more on direct
hits.
According to all the video, Indonesia’s team more
likely use sweep in their match especially for Class A. We can see from the
result that during the match against Singapore and Philippines, the athletes
have the high potential of using dodge and catch. For Class D, Indonesia should
increase their accuracy on blowing direct hits and decrease miss target on
opponent. Class D also uses less blocking and that costs the competitor to
receive more punches and kicks.
RECOMMENDATION
I
would recommend silat athletes to practice more on their target and technique
to improve their performance especially on catch, dodge, punch, kick, sweep,
and topple. To be a very capable and good silat athlete, we must train longer
to improve the technique and enhance the level of performance. Not just that,
video analysis also can be a guidance to identify the athlete’s mistake, so
that repairmen can be done to help for the upcoming events.
REFERENCES
1.
Jähnichen, G. (2016).
Silat: Observations from stong (kelantan) and from kuala penyu (sabah).
2.
Shapie, M. N. M., Oliver, J.,
O'Donoghue, P., & Tong, R. (2009). Activity
during action time in international silat competition. Paper presented at
the 3rd International Workshop of the International Society of Performance
Analysis of Sport.
3. Widiastuti,
W. (2014). Using game approach in improving learning outcomes of pencak silat. Asian Social Science, 10(5), 168.
4. Abidin,
N. Z., & Adam, M. B. (2013). Prediction of vertical jump height from
anthropometric factors in male and female martial arts athletes. The Malaysian
journal of medical sciences: MJMS, 20(1), 39.
5. Aziz,
A. R., Tan, B., & Teh, K. C. (2002). Physiological responses during matches
and profile of elite pencak silat exponents. Journal of Sports Science and
Medicine, 1, 147-155.
6. Davidson,
A., & Trewartha, G. (2008). Understanding the physiological demands of
netball: A time-motion investigation. International Journal of Performance
Analysis in Sport, 8(3), 1-17.
7. King,
S., & O'Donoghue, P. (2003). The activity profile of men's gaelic football.
International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 3(2), 130-144.
8. O'Donoghue,
P., Rudkin, S., Bloomfield, J., Powell, S., Cairns, G., Dunkerley, A., et al.
(2005). Repeated work activity in english fa premier league soccer.
International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 5(2), 46-57.
9. Stark,
S. (2008). Pencak silat pertempuran: Stepping from stone to stone: Sean Stark.
10.
Parnabas,
V., Shapie, M. N. M., & Parnabas, J. (2015). Level of drugs usage and sport
performance in malay silat. Ido Movement
for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 15(2), 45-51.
11.
Shapie,
M. N. M., Oliver, J., O’Donoghue, P., & Tong, R. (2014). Fitness
characteristics of youth silat performers. Journal
of Sports Science and Medicine, 1, 147-155.
12.
Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class A Final INA vs VIE (Day 9) - 28th SEA
Games Singapore 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TogWi7jsKcU&t=25s
13.
Pencak Silat Men's Tanding Class A Semi-Final PHI vs INA (Day 8) | 28th
SEA Games Singapore 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5JphsM7YiU
14.
Pencak Silat Tanding Category Indonesia vs Singapore (Day 6) | 28th SEA
Games Singapore 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdKHSsMioug
15.
Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class D Semi-Final THAI vs INA(Day 8) | 28th
SEA Games Singapore 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38l1L7K_Bf0&t=83s
Comments
Post a Comment